Current:Home > NewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -StockHorizon
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-15 10:32:49
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Reese Witherspoon Debuts Her Post-Breakup Bangs With Stunning Selfie
- Exxon Reports on Climate Risk and Sees Almost None
- Ryan Gosling Reveals the Daily Gifts He Received From Margot Robbie While Filming Barbie
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- North Carolina's governor vetoed a 12-week abortion ban, setting up an override fight
- What we know about the health risks of ultra-processed foods
- Kim Zolciak Shares Message on Manipulation and Toxic Behavior Amid Kroy Biermann Divorce
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- With growing abortion restrictions, Democrats push for over-the-counter birth control
Ranking
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Wildfires Trap Thousands on Beach in Australia as Death Toll Rises
- Victorian England met a South African choir with praise, paternalism and prejudice
- Earth’s Hottest Decade on Record Marked by Extreme Storms, Deadly Wildfires
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Ariana Madix Claims Tom Sandoval and Raquel Leviss Had Sex in Her Guest Room While She Was Asleep
- iCarly Cast Recalls Emily Ratajkowski's Hilarious Cameo
- Want to understand your adolescent? Get to know their brain
Recommendation
Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
FDA advisers support approval of RSV vaccine to protect infants
CBS News poll finds most say colleges shouldn't factor race into admissions
Cincinnati Bengals punter Drue Chrisman picks up side gig as DoorDash delivery driver
Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
Cincinnati Bengals punter Drue Chrisman picks up side gig as DoorDash delivery driver
Will China and the US Become Climate Partners Again?
Trump’s EPA Starts Process for Replacing Clean Power Plan