Current:Home > FinanceFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -StockHorizon
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Fastexy View
Date:2025-04-11 04:20:28
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (272)
Related
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Russians commemorate victims of Soviet repression as a present-day crackdown on dissent intensifies
- 3 Sumatran tiger cubs have been born at a zoo in Nashville
- Steelers star safety Minkah Fitzpatrick leaves game against Jags with hamstring injury
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- In Mississippi, most voters will have no choice about who represents them in the Legislature
- Matthew Perry's Family Speaks Out After Actor's Death
- UAW escalates strike against lone holdout GM after landing tentative pacts with Stellantis and Ford
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- North Macedonia police intercept a group of 77 migrants and arrest 7 suspected traffickers
Ranking
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Here's what Speaker Mike Johnson says he will and won't bring to the House floor
- Russia says it shot down 36 Ukrainian drones as fighting grinds on in Ukraine’s east
- NC State coach Dave Doeren rips Steve Smith after Wolfpack win: 'He can kiss my ...'
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- NASCAR Martinsville playoff race 2023: Start time, TV, streaming, lineup for Xfinity 500
- Matthew Perry Dead at 54: Olivia Munn, Rumer Willis and More Stars React
- Poultry companies ask judge to dismiss ruling that they polluted an Oklahoma watershed
Recommendation
Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
Matthew Perry Dead at 54
Ketel Marte wins America free Taco Bell with first stolen base of 2023 World Series
Who Were the Worst of the Worst Climate Polluters in 2022?
Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
Watch as a curious bear rings a doorbell at a California home late at night
Former Vice President Mike Pence ends campaign for the White House after struggling to gain traction
Colombian police continue search for father of Liverpool striker Díaz